Deflections in Fire Stopping: Designing Fire Stopping Systems with Deflection in Mind

Effective fire stopping plays a critical role in passive fire protection by maintaining compartmentation – sealing joints and reinstating barriers after service penetrations are installed. But, a crucial and often overlooked consideration is the impact of structural deflection and movement. If not addressed at the design stage, these forces can cause fire seals to fail – cracking, pulling apart, or losing compliance altogether.

With the introduction of the Building Safety Act and its gateway process, passive fire protection systems in buildings over 18 metres must now be specified much earlier in the project lifecycle. As a result, it’s important to account for any anticipated building movement during early design, ensuring fire stopping solutions remain compliant and effective.

 

Understanding Structural Deflection and Its Impact on Fire Stopping

 

Deflection refers to the bending or displacement of structural elements under load. When services like pipes or cables are attached to these structures, they move with them. Fire stopping systems must accommodate this movement to prevent failure.

 

Identifying whether deflection will occur is a key decision point in the planning of passive fire protection. If movement is expected, designers must integrate flexibility into fire stopping solutions – particularly at partition joints and service penetrations – to maintain performance and regulatory compliance.

 

Where Deflection Affects Fire Protection Most

 

One of the most sensitive areas in a building is where flexible partition walls meet rigid elements like floors and ceilings. These interfaces are prone to movement, which is typically managed using a deflection head. However, any fire stopping used at these junctions must also absorb this movement to stay intact and compliant.

 

A fire stop at the ceiling or floor line must match the movement capabilities of the wall system it’s sealing. Products used here must conform to the performance criteria of EN 1366-4 and demonstrate their ability to withstand extension, compression, and forces.

 

Service Penetrations and Movement Considerations

 

In addition to partition joints, service penetrations also present challenges when it comes to deflection. Where multiple services penetrate a compartment wall or floor – such as pipes, ducts, or cables – spacing becomes a critical design consideration.

 

To comply with EN 1366-3, apertures must be spaced with deflection in mind. Typically, the gap between a service and the edge of the substrate should be at least four times the expected deflection. Without this buffer, structural movement could compromise both the integrity of the substrate and the fire stopping performance.

 

Three-sided penetrations, which contact the slab above, clearly require flexibility to accommodate deflection. However, even four-sided openings not directly touching the deflection head still require movement allowances – since the services they support are ultimately connected to moving structural components.

 

While there are mechanical solutions such as spring-loaded supports, these are rarely used due to cost and complexity. The most practical and scalable solution is to integrate flexibility directly into the fire stopping system.

 

Challenges with Testing Standards

 

While EN 1366-4 covers linear joint fire stopping and includes provisions for movement, there is no equivalent formal testing standard for movement in service penetration seals. Despite this gap, best practice and building regulations (e.g. Approved Document B) recommend that movement still be factored into the design to ensure lifetime performance.

 

Movement should be accommodated not only in the spacing between services but also within the fire stopping material itself. This is particularly important at the slab edge, where deflection can occur between the building’s structure and facade. While open state cavity barriers offer some inherent flexibility, closed state systems require deliberate accommodation for movement.

 

The Importance of Early Planning

 

Rigid fire stopping products cannot be retrofitted into designs requiring flexibility – but flexible systems can be used in rigid setups. That’s why it’s important to establish movement requirements early in the design phase.

 

By working closely with passive fire protection manufacturers from the outset, specifiers and fire engineers, like our team at Ark Fire Protection, can ensure that flexibility is built into fire stopping systems wherever needed. Early specification helps secure long-term compliance and supports safe, future-proofed building designs.

Get in touch to learn how we can help with your next fire protection project

Join over 1,000 UK businesses who have already had Fire Protection installed by Ark Fire Protection.

Get in touch

Recent Articles

Learn more about passive fire protection by reading other articles created by our experts.

the golden thread

The Golden Thread in Construction

This article explores the key principles behind the Golden Thread and its role in shaping a safer and more sustainable built environment.

Read more
beam deflection

Deflections in Fire Stopping

Effective fire stopping plays a critical role in passive fire protection by maintaining compartmentation – sealing joints and reinstating barriers after service penetrations are installed. But, a crucial and often overlooked consideration is the impact of structural deflection and movement.

Read more
fire safety legislation

Proud to be Part of the SWPA Fire Safety (FS2) Framework

We’re proud to be part of the South West Procurement Alliance (SWPA) Fire Safety (FS2) Framework, offering a comprehensive solution to local authorities, social landlords, and public sector organisations

Read more