What happens when intumescent reporting or QA goes wrong
If the record can’t prove the thickness
Structural fire protection lives or dies on the dry film thickness applied to each section. If the record can’t prove the right thickness went onto the right steel for the required period, the protection is unverified – however good the spraying was. Unverified protection gets rejected at review and reopened after any structural change, which can mean re-testing or re-coating a frame that’s already clad, serviced and fitted out.
If there’s no QA on site
Coatings get applied in the wrong temperature or humidity, thicknesses are estimated rather than measured, substrate preparation is skipped, and knocks from follow-on trades are left un-touched-up. The coating looks finished and isn’t. It only has to fail once – in the one event it exists to survive.
How Ark proves the protection
Wet film and dry film thickness testing as standard, condition logging at every stage, holiday detection, batch traceability back to the manufacturer, and documented touch-up after follow-on trades. Every section’s protection is measured and recorded, mapping straight to the structural fire-protection evidence the building needs.